Posts Tagged ‘Lawrence’

Seton Hall Pirates Show No Progress

March 11th, 2010

The camera caught a Seton Hall player looking dejected in the middle of the second half. He knew the game was over for his team, and his team would be heading to the NIT.

Seton Hall needed to get at least two Big East tournament wins to qualify for the NCAA tournament, but instead, they settled for only one victory after taking a 68-56 loss to the Notre Dame Fighting Irish at Madison Square Garden Wednesday night.

The Pirates blew it after losing to Marquette at home few weeks ago. They wouldn't be fighting for their playoff lives had they done their job at home.

That's when they lost their bid. It had nothing to do with tonight's game, when one analyzes what really went wrong for the Pirates.

It wasn't surprising the Hall lost to the Irish. Yes, they defeated them in January, but their opponent is a different team now than back then. The Irish had won six of seven heading into the Big East Tournament.

In this game, it came down to a superstar. Notre Dame has one and Seton Hall doesn't.

When Seton Hall struggled to make baskets in a tight game, the Fighting Irish knew they would— thanks to Luke Harangody.

Harangody scored in the middle of the first half, and he helped give the Irish a nice lead heading to halftime.

By then, the Pirates never recovered. The Irish continued to score by running their fast break to start the second half.

The Pirates would make it interesting, but everyone knew the Irish would not blow this lead. If it came down to that situation, Harangody would bail them out.

Of course, they didn't need him in that situation.

There's something to learn from this game. Until the Pirates get a star like Harangody, they are going to be fighting for a tournament spot every year.

Marginal players are not enough to win in the Big East. It works for the mid-major conferences, but as Bobby Gonzalez finds out, it does not work here.

Gonzalez has not found success in getting the stars to play at Seton Hall. The stars know they can win and be good players for better programs in the Big East.

The Seton Hall coach settles with getting guys from junior-college instead. He feels he can develop them into stars, but that's hard to do.

They can only do so much. So far, it hasn't worked either.

Herb Pope and Jordan Theodore have not exactly panned out as stars. Keon Lawrence does not perform much.

It's one thing to play well against the bad teams, but it's another thing to go up against the great teams.

Something has to be done. This can't go on.

Either Gonzalez needs to hire someone to help him recruit those guys or he has to do a better job. One wonders if his reputation scares off others.

If that's the case, maybe it's time for the school to go in another direction.

They might as well. Does anyone think Gonzalez is the guy to lead the Pirates to where they want to be?

Seton Hall fans called for Louis Orr to be fired for two reasons. For one thing, he didn't recruit well enough, and secondly, he never took them far into the postseason.

Gonzalez is in the same situation, however, fans seem to believe in him for whatever reason.

It's hard to believe. It's been three years with nothing to show for it.

Seton Hall will stick with their guy for a while, but if this is the best he can do for the next two years, they need to think long and hard about firing him.

They probably should, but they won't.

Gonzalez will talk about how his team overachieved and how being in the NIT is a good thing for his program. Who's he kidding?

By now, they should be a tournament team under Gonzalez's leadership every year.

They're no better than they were under Orr.

Hard to believe things are changing anytime soon.

Why Heavyweight Boxing Can’t Get Back On Its Feet

March 10th, 2010

I love boxing, it is one of the greatest sports ever. Within boxing, the heavyweight division carries the flag for the casual observer.

I try to love the heavyweight division, I really do. I defend it, even if I know its wrong. I like big guys punching each other in the face, it is lovely.

I love the Klitschkos too. I think they are underrated and deserve more respect. However, upon hearing that a Vitali Klitschko vs. Nikolay Valuev match fell through, I wasn’t very disappointed.

That wasn’t going to be a good fight, and I was interested in seeing who Klitschko was going to target next. Then today I see he is fighting Albert Sosnowski (45-2-1 27 KO). My heart dropped with disappointment.

This is the exact reason why the heavyweight division is not taken seriously. I have seen Sosnowski fight and know his name, but outside of really hardcore boxing fans, he is 100 percent unknown.

He is unknown for a good reason too: he hasn’t beaten a top 20 fighter. How he got a title shot at what used to be the most prestigious title in sports is beyond me.

His best win came against Danny Williams, who is a hit-or-miss fighter. He has okay wins over South African titleholder Osborne Machimana and over the hill cruiserweight Orlin Norris.

He wont the EBU (European) heavyweight title against Paolo Vidoz in his last fight. His one draw came against interesting prospect Francesco Pianeta.

The two losses, you ask? Well, this the bad part. He lost an early fight to Arthur Cook; that’s fine, fighters lose early in their career.

The second loss is the red flag. He lost to Zuri Lawrence.

Yes, the same Zuri Lawrence who has no knockouts in 24 wins, and has 15 losses. This loss came only two years ago, so there is no excusing it.

His power hasn’t shown up against a top level opponent outside of Danny Williams. Receiving a title fight with one good win, two okay wins, and a horrible loss is just insane.

Klitschko is one of, if not the best, heavyweights since Lennox Lewis retired; he's beaten at least eight top level opponents, and many more contenders. He has held the heavyweight title three times, and has been a top level heavyweight since 1999.

But, I have seen crazier things than a Sosnowski upset: Vitali himself went from a EBU title to the world championship, so this isn’t anything that is totally new. The difference is he wasn’t facing the second best or best heavyweight at the time.

He beat Herbie Hide to win the WBO title. This fight could end up being competitive, but who really cares besides people in Germany and Klitschko fans?

I am Polish and so is Sosnowski, but even I have a hard time finding this fight interesting. I would love to see a Polish heavyweight champion, but come on: is this really the right fight?

I love boxing and the heavyweight division, but will you please make it easier to defend the sport to the non-boxing fan? I give you my unconditional love, and this is what I get in return? Please just make it easier to defend you. Pretty please?

Big 12 Conference Basketball Tournament: What to Expect ,Game-By-Game Analysis

March 9th, 2010

For a conference that at one point this season looked to be far and away the best conference in all of basketball, much was left to be desired after all 12 teams finished their tough 16-game conference schedules. 

The Kansas Jayhawks, who have been at the perch of college basketball for nearly the entire season, came away with the Big 12 regular season title, going 15-1.

Kansas State seemed to surprise everyone in the college basketball world and finished 11-5 in conference, yet sputtered to the finish line with a lopsided loss to Kansas, and an extremely disappointing loss at home to Iowa State on Saturday. 

Texas A&M and Baylor also finished the season 11-5, and both programs will consider their finishes a high mark when they look back on the 2009-2010 season. 

The biggest disappointment of the Big 12 was Texas.

After holding strong at the No. 2 position in both the AP and Coaches polls through the non-conference portion of the season, Texas sputtered throughout the conference season.

For a team with such high expectations for this season, inconsistent play from its younger players, as well as a lack of cohesion in the back court, should be blamed for the Longhorns horrific finish to the season. 

The conference as a whole failed to live up to the glamorous expectations many had for it in the preseason. While five teams finished the season with double-digits in the conference winning column, most would have pegged six or seven when the season started. 

Looking back though, the Big 12 should be getting at least seven teams into the NCAA tournament come the CBS Selection Show this coming Sunday. With seven teams in, this would be a record for the Big 12. 

We'll be 10 days into March when the Big 12 tournament tips off.

Last season's tournament provided plenty of surprises as Missouri took out a streaking Baylor team in the Conference Final. 

This year could provide even more parity. I'll be taking a look at every single game in this season's tournament, and providing my predictions on how it will all shape up. 

 

First Round Games on Wednesday, March 10

 

No. 8 Colorado against No.9 Texas Tech 

This should easily be the best matchup of the four opening-round games. Obviously with seeds No. 8 and No. 9 facing each other, that is what you would expect. 

Colorado has really refused to vanish into the depths of the conference standings, and has put on some great performances along the way.

Texas Tech followed up a strong showing in non-conference play with lackluster play inside the conference.  

This game is a rematch of this past weekend's game where Colorado prevailed 101-90 in Boulder. 

I think Colorado will match their result from this past weekend, although I don't think the game will produce 191 points. 

 

No. 7 Oklahoma State against No. 10. Oklahoma

Bedlam will play out for a third time this season, this time in Kansas City's Sprint Center. 

Each team won at their home venues during the conference regular season.

The neutral floor could prove to be the equalizer in this game. Oklahoma State has more talent than Oklahoma, but whether or not they use it to their advantage is another matter. 

That said, the Cowboys are playing pretty well as of late, winning five of their last seven games. Oklahoma, meanwhile, has lost a staggering eight straight after starting 4-4 in conference. 

Current form is just too overwhelming to argue with. The Cowboys should prevail rather easily on Wednesday evening. 

 

No. 6  Texas against No. 11 Iowa State

As previously mentioned, several factors may have contributed to Texas finishing sixth best this season in conference play. 

That aside, they'll be facing an Iowa State team that comes off a huge win against the No. 5 ranked Kansas State Wildcats, in Manhattan. 

Iowa State gave the Longhorns all they could handle in Ames to open the conference season back in January, but came up short. 

That Cyclone team had two more quality players than it does now, yet Iowa State will be looking to mobilize some of its fan base south to Kansas City. 

If enough Cyclone fans decide to make the three-and-a-half hour journey to downtown Kansas City and provide an atmosphere, they may have a chance. 

Texas will be playing with a chip on its shoulder and they undoubtedly have the talent to crush the Cyclones, but its the exercising of that talent that has come into question all season. 

Barring phenomenal performances from both Marquis Gilstrap and Craig Brackins, the Longhorns shouldn't have many problems dispatching of the Cyclones on Wednesday. 

 

No. 5 Missouri against No. 12 Nebraska

Falling just out of the final four teams and given a first round conference tournament bye, Missouri is instead rewarded with a matchup against perennial Big 12 bottom feeder Nebraska. 

Missouri won both contests they had against the Huskers this season handily, and no one expects this result to be any different, especially with the large alumni base Kansas City possesses. 

 

Second Round Games - March 11

No. 4 Texas A&M against No. 5 Missouri

The Aggies were one of the two losses Missouri felt in its home venue this season when they lost 77-74 to A&M. 

A&M is 10-3 over their last 13 games; they certainly have to like how they matchup with Missouri. The Aggies will look to use their size to over power Missouri, similar to what Kansas did to the Tigers this past weekend. 

Not unlike the 8-9 game, paper indicates this to be the toughest of the contests on Thursday, and no one should doubt that it will be the toughest. 

The game will take place at 2:00 pm local time, and that may have an impact on the amount of Missouri fans making it into the Sprint Center. 

If Missouri can speed the game up, and continue to play at the frantic pace they thrive in, I'd imagine they would win. 

Whichever team dictates the pace in this one, will win. I think the Aggies' front court gets the job done. Look for this game to be marred by fouls. 

No. 3 Baylor against No. 6 Texas

After beating Iowa State, a close friend suggests that the win over the Cyclones will be Texas' last victory of the 2009-2010 season. 

I don't know if I will go that far, but it's hard to see them beating this Baylor team. The Longhorns were losers both times these teams met during the regular season. 

Texas is not a very good shooting team, and Baylor plays a lot of zone defense, which means you have to shoot the ball well to win. 

If Texas can ride any momentum they may gain with their likely win over Iowa State, while Baylor has sat idle for several days, they may have a chance against the Bears. 

These two teams met in the final game of the regular season with Baylor winning by a score of 92-77. I'm guessing this one is a little closer than 15 points, but I still like Baylor. 

No.2 K-State against No. 7 Oklahoma State

K-State comes into the game saddled on a two-game losing streak, and Oklahoma State is playing well. 

The Cowboys won the only meeting between these teams in Manhattan earlier in the year. It was after that loss that K-State went on the hot streak that moved them into the nation's top 5. 

I'd expect coach Frank Martin to have his guys fired up to play on Thursday.

If Kansas State can contain Oklahoma State star James Anderson, they should have no problem scoring enough points to do the job. 

Oklahoma State can leave Kansas City with their heads held high, with an NCAA at-large bid in tow. 

No. 1 Kansas against No. 8 Colorado

Colorado was the first conference opponent that looked as though they would put a dent in the Jayhawks' then-perfect conference record in Boulder. 

A determined Kansas team buckled down and held on for a 72-66 decision in overtime. The rematch in Lawrence was never much of a game, and Kansas put up 94, winning by 20. 

Although the game will take place at 11:30 am local time, you would expect there to be plenty of Kansas fans in attendance to root on their Jayhawks. The atmosphere won't compare to Allen Fieldhouse, but it will still feel like a home game for the men in white and blue. 

Sherron Collins will be reminding his teammates about the disappointing second round exit, last season. As such, I'd expect Kansas to win big. 

 

Semi-Final Round March 12 

No. 2. Kansas State against No. 3 Baylor 

These two teams competed in one of the better Big 12 games during the regular season. No one watched because it was locally televised. 

K-State came out on top in Waco, 76-74 on a last-second shot. Baylor will be out for revenge, but beating Kansas State in Kansas City will be a tough task. 

This will be the late game on Friday night, and there will be thousands of Kansas State fans in the Sprint Center to root on the Wildcats. 

The game will probably become a track meet, much like the one from earlier this season. The home court feel of the Sprint Center should be enough to propel the Wildcats to the tournament final. 

No. 1 Kansas against No. 4 Texas A&M 

This game will be a rematch of the Big Monday clash that took place on Feb. 15. 

Kansas struggled for the majority of the game, and after a late surge by Kansas and a cold streak from A&M, Kansas prevailed 59-54 in College Station. 

The crowd should play a big role in this contest. The game will be played an hour after most people get off of work on Friday evening, so I expect there to be thousands of Kansas fans attending. 

Texas A&M is a great team, and I expect them to win one or two games in the NCAA tournament, but dealing with Kansas in front of what will seem like a home crowd is a task I don't believe they will be up to. 

 

Big 12 Tournament Championship Game March 13

No. 1. Kansas against No. 2 Kansas State

Throughout the entire Big 12 season, two teams have been a cut above the rest. K-State struggled in their last couple of games, but I don't think that is indicative of a lasting problem. 

The Kansas State players, coaches, and fans all will have a strong desire to see this one through, especially after suffering two defeats against Kansas during the regular season including a brutal loss in overtime, in Manhattan. 

This has the potential to be the best conference championship game of the entire lot. Neither team really have much to play for aside from the glory of lifting the Big 12 trophy. 

Kansas State, should they get to the championship game, will have locked up a No. 2 seed, and will in all likelihood be playing a first round NCAA tournament game in nearby Oklahoma City. 

Kansas, should they make it to the championship game, should have wrapped up the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament. 

Both of those things said, each of these teams will want to win this game.

For Kansas it will be another year to add to one of their many championship banners. 

For Kansas State, a win would help Frank Martin announce to the nation that Kansas State is now a quality basketball program and is here to stay. 

The local markets will be hoping for this scenario, as Kansas City is the hub for many KU and K-State alumni. 

I'd expect another great game, and I'd expect another Kansas victory. 

 

Reflection: 

Looking back, I've picked "chalk" the whole way through. The likelihood of that actually happening is slim.

With the exception of the Missouri-Nebraska game, any one of the lower seeds in the first round games could prevail. 

Texas losing to Iowa State would not come as a total shock to me, or most who have been following the Big 12 this year. 

In the second round, the biggest question will be whether or not Kansas State can get by Oklahoma State.

I picked Kansas State because they've played there way into a position where they need that win to secure a No. 2 seed in the NCAA tournament, as well as the fact they'll have the crowd on their side. 

However, Oklahoma State is good enough to beat Kansas State, and I don't think many would be surprised if that happens. 

Missouri could also give Texas A&M a hard time, but I think A&M have the talent and a big advantage in the front court with Davis. 

I wouldn't be surprised if A&M were to upset KU. It would take a poor effort from the Jayhawks matched by a solid game from the Aggies, but it's not out of the realm of possibility. 

Finally, if the final I've suggested becomes reality, K-State has what it takes to beat KU, we just have yet to see them put 40 minutes of solid basketball together against the Jayhawks. 

Women’s Professional Soccer: St. Louis Athletica Training Camp Begins Today

March 9th, 2010

The St. Louis Athletica will begin their second training camp today.

The team has already welcomed 22 players on the field during an early camp last week. These players have already played in one scrimmage.

St. Louis has continued their latest round of player signings as well. The Athletica have come to terms with defender Sarah Wagenfuhr, forward/midfielder India Trotter, forward Kristina Larsen, and midfielder Carolyn Blank.

In addition to these players, the Athletica announced that they agreed with terms with Brazilian midfielder Daniela.

Daniela appeared in three games with the Athletica in 2009, having been injured in a game against the Washington Freedom on May 3.  She tore two ligaments in her knee and also suffered a crack in her tibia.

The Athletica also released their preseason exhibition schedule which includes one host  game at Anheuser-Busch Soccer Park on March 13 at 3:00 p.m. against the University of Illinois. The Athletica will also play Missouri at the University of Missouri at 2:00 p.m. and on April 3, they will face off at 3:00 p.m. against WPS newcomers, the Atlanta Beat in Tuscaloosa, Oklahoma.

Following WPS rules, the Athletica are allowed to have 28 players on their roster when their training camp begins on March 8.

 

On March 16, clubs are required to cut to 24 players and on April 1, teams will whittle down to 18 active roster players in addition to four developmental players.

 

The following 26 players are on the St. Louis Athletica roster as camp begins on Monday.

 

Name Position College/Country

 

1. Hope Solo, Goalkeeper, Washington

2. India Trotter, Forward/Midfielder, Florida State

3. Carolyn Blank, Defender, West Virginia

4. Kendall Fletcher, Midfielder, North Carolina

5. Lindsay Tarpley, Midfielder, North Carolina

6. Aya Miyama, Midfielder, (Japan International)

7. Shannon Boxx, Midfielder, Notre Dame

8. Tina Ellertson, Defender, Washington

9. Eniola Aluko, Forward, (England International)

10. Daniela, Midfielder, (Brazil International)

11. Kristina Larsen, Forward, UCLA

12. Elise Weber, Defender, Notre Dame

13. Sarah Teegarden, Midfielder, UW-Milwaukee

15. Veronica Perez, Midfielder, Washington

17. Lori Chalupny, Midfielder, North Carolina

18. Ashlyn Harris, Goalkeeper, North Carolina

19. Madelaine Edlund, Forward, (Sweden International)

20. Elaine Midfielder, (Brazil International)

22. Sarah Wagenfuhr, Defender, Florida State

23. Katie Jo Spisak, Goalkeeper, Texas A&M

25. Tina DiMartino, Midfielder, UCLA

NA. Lindsay Vera, Midfielder, North Carolina State

NA. Mary McDonnell, Defender, Illinois

NA. Lauren Sesselman, Forward, Purdue

NA. Erin Walter, Midfielder, DePaul

NA. Kelly Lawrence, Defender, Indiana

The Super 14 Sharks: Referee Sinks

March 8th, 2010

Ok, so it has taken me four weeks to watch my first Super 14 game of the season and judging by what I saw I am very glad I did not watch the first three.

 

Well that is not quite fair. I have been watching the highlights on Super Sport Blitz and it's no surprise that the Blue Bulls are playing fantastic rugby, scoring tries, and playing an expansive game. Even the supposedly kicking fly half, going by the name of Morne Steyn, has scored three tries this season—in fact he has scored more points than what the Sharks have scored.

 

Well, given the state of the way that my beloved Sharks have performed this season, this next topic is going to sound like sour grapes, but as a coach and a referee I feel rocks for what my people say.

 

Cheating in sport is not acceptable and never will be.

 

I have a saying for people that cheat while playing golf—like those guys that kick a golf ball further on so that their shot is not played from behind a tree; “Cheating at golf is like faking an orgasm while masturbating .”

 

Curtly Beale is a cheat and he should be banned from rugby for at least six months. A yellow card was not punishment enough for what he did. If ever there was an example for a professional foul that was it. When you deliberately slap a ball down to prevent a try from being scored the sanction should have been a Red Card and a penalty try should have been awarded.

 

Paul Marks, the referee, was so inconsistent on the field. In fact, I would go as far as to say that he is a cheat.

 

The first yellow card for Jannie Du Plessis was on and John Plumtree should have benched him for tripping a player.I can't believe a doctor could be so stupid.

 

The second Yellow Card about two minutes later was not acceptable. The law states that if a ball is not covered by a player bound and on his feet it is deemed to be out. The fact the Andy Goode came from behind his try line to pick the ball up, a ball that was out, and then gets binned is unbelievable.

 

When the Australian commentators (the worst and most biased commentators in the world) say the call is harsh you must know that you have messed up as a referee.

 

As the game progressed it became clear that the inconsistencies were going to impact the result of the game.

 

The amount of penalties awarded against the Sharks for not rolling away was staggering in the first half. But, the inconsistencies really became clear in the second half when the tables turned and the Sharks fought their way back into the game, forcing the Warathas to defend.

 

Scrums would be awarded where penalties should have been given. At one stage in the 65th minute there were three infringements where the tackler did not move away, thereby preventing quick balls to the Sharks and point scoring opportunities.

 

If a Yellow Card had been issued as was the case with Andy Goode, the numbers would have made a major impact on the game. But, this did not happen even after Paul Marks spoke to Phil Waugh.

 

The fact the Jon Smit and John Plumtree have been so diplomatic, protecting referees at all costs, is a shame to the state of rugby.

 

Marks should be called in front of the Panel and told that he can go back to ref club rugby, because that is all that he is capable of controlling.

 

As for Steve Welsh there was a reason that NZR had cut ties with him. Now, staying in Australia, one can see that he has got the same syndrome that Paul Marks has. It is very simple with Super 14 rugby, pick the best referees and let them ref. If the junior referees want to get to this level they must up their game.

 

The problem is that the refereeing at the moment is crap—Kaplan, Lawrence, Joubert, and Jonker are the only guys that are doing sterling work. Bryce Lawrence messed up so badly on Saturday night with a blatant Spear Tackle on Juan Smith. Bryce, sanctions for the spear tackle start with a Red Card, then you work your way down. The fact that Kaplan had to explain this to you is beyond belief.

 

Short of a miracle or a major change of game play, the Sharks will be very lucky to make the playoffs. Only time will tell. Let’s just hope that the standard of refereeing will improve in the weeks to come.

 



eXTReMe Tracker