“Quit Living In The Past”: Why Anything “Old” Won’t Work Now (Pt.1)

December 29th, 2009 by Ashley Morris No comments »

In my humble opinion, pro wrestling will die a gruesome death if the old ECW, nWo, and Attitude Era are brought back, if Sheamus has the rug swept up from under his push, and if TNA continues to allow Hulk Hogan to dominate their programming. Period.

A while back, I crafted an article that talked about how the WWE Divas could benefit from looking back at what made the division successful in the past. Although that particular article didn't receive as many reads as I thought it would, it seems that several faithful B/R members and fans have taken my words to heart in some way, form, or fashion. These fans not only want to take what was successful in the past, they want to relive that past altogether.

That will not work, and will only slowly kill an organization.

"The business works in cycles." I cannot remember where I read these words or who said them, but the point was succinct and crystal clear. Pro wrestling will have periods where it is red hot, and ice cold. But, the fact remains that the success of certain feuds, storylines, and characters rely heavily on the fickle moods and tastes of the consumers.

In other words, pro wrestling is about supply and demand.

All of the things mentioned in the opening paragraph would fail because the demand for them is relatively low. John "Superman" Cena and DX continue to dominate WWE television and PPVs because fans demand to see them through merchandise sales and crowd reaction. While one could successfully argue that TV ratings and PPV buy rates are down, it could also be argued that at this point in the business, that's more of a sign of the times and not necessarily a sign of the product.

If the business truly moves in cycles, then this is a period where fans and the general population are lukewarm to pro wrestling. However, it is during this lukewarm period that any pro wrestling organization can seize the opportunity to groom a new generation of main event stars and the next generation of die hard fans. You cannot accomplish these goals though appealing to the die hard fans of today by bringing back dated storylines and wrestlers from ten plus years ago.

The business IS a business.  All businesses in this country (outside of non-profits) exist to make money. Companies care slightly more about their profits than they do about their consumers, and will do anything and everything necessary to boost their sales in the long-run first, and the short-term second. Anything after that is tertiary to their goal of being a profitable company.

Thus, while some fans may disagree with the current state of a company's product, the sales from merchandising and the money from sponsors and advertisers do not lie. If a company can stand to make more money with their current product then they will, regardless of how many tirades we may embark upon amongst our ICW brethren. And that is a fact one cannot argue with.

Let's go over some of the things mentioned in the opening paragraph.

The Old ECW and the Attitude Era


A lot of fans are upset with the rumor that the WWE may rebrand the ECW product in early 2010, and while they look favorably and anxiously towards the future, almost every commentator will bring up the fact that the "new" ECW is no where near being as great as the "old" ECW. Soon after that, someone will say, "They should bring back the old ECW."

Fact: the "old" ECW was way more entertaining than the "new" ECW, and I concur wholeheartedly with that belief. However, you'd be foolish to believe that a reincarnation of ECW under the guidance of Vince McMahon would look anything like the original ECW. Hell, the original Eastern Championship Wrestling looked nothing like Extreme Championship Wrestling, but it seems to me that no one is clamoring for the days of Todd Gordon's booking.

Extreme Championship Wrestling, much like the WWE's Attitude Era, worked at the time it did due to the fan's demand for that type of particular product. A lot of folks that were watching pro wrestling at that time (myself included) were once kids that watched Hulk Hogan, Rock N' Wrestling , and neon face paint Sting. When these fans became teenagers, they also became anti-establishment, chaotic, rude, crass, vulgar, and horny. Great time for that product to make a stand.

These days, there are kids and mothers watching the product, and to have boobs, blood, and vulgarities in every other segment would not only turn these kids and mothers away from the product, but the sponsors as well.

Don't believe me. Watch Monday Night RAW tonight and keep tab of the commercials that come on during the program. Then ask yourself this question: "Would [insert sponsor here] still pay money to advertise their product tonight if Jillian Hall ran around the ring topless covering herself with her index and middle fingers?"

If your answer is "no," then you will understand why the old ECW and Attitude Era wouldn't work today.

Another factor is that a good number of the fans today have no clue whatsoever what the old ECW or Attitude Era was about. I have a twelve year old cousin that showed me a Randy Orton RKO-collage on YouTube the other day. I showed him a Diamond Dallas Page Diamond Cutter-collage, and it blew his mind that the RKO wasn't a unique maneuver and that there was a wrestler that could do it better than Randy Orton. The Attitude Era and the old ECW are figments of his imagination, as he didn't even exist when they were around, and I was in the 8th/9th grade in it's heyday.

Sadly, I would guess that my cousin's generation makes up the most profitable demographic for the WWE at this point. I say that because although I have way more WWE DVDs than he does, he's got way more action figures, rings, and replica championship belts than I do. He would gladly attend the PPVs with me if (a) he had the money, and (b) we lived in the same state. He can usually get the money a lot faster than I can, and I have a job.

Another important point to make is the fact that a lot of the wrestlers from the old ECW and the Attitude Era are well past their prime and have aged horribly. These wrestlers did not benefit from a company instituted "Wellness Program," and are possibly dealing with substance abuse problems.

It is a known fact that half of the wrestlers that worked for Extreme Championship wrestling are dead. A third of the wrestlers are out-of-shape, broken and barely able to walk, or are off the pro wrestling radar completely. So that leaves the fans with 25% of the wrestlers that made ECW popular still around today and able to put on a show.

With those numbers, if one were to bring back the original Extreme Championship Wrestling, it would be no where near as exciting or profitable as it was in its prime.

Now let's be realistic and honest with ourselves.  Do we really believe that Vince McMahon will allow something that he's not responsible for make money for him?  Everyone knows that wrestlers from other organizations usually hustle in the WWE for about six years before they get a chance to run with the ball (Benoit, Guerrero, Booker T just to name a few).  So, could we really expect the new ECW to look like the old ECW without McMahon having a say in it at all?  No chance in hell (pun intended).

Would you take credit for something that you didn't come up with?  So why would we demand that Vince McMahon financially support an idea that was successful without his say? 

If that happened, then we wouldn't thank the WWE for maintaining the old ECW; we'd thank Paul Heyman for his programming and quietly forget that the company is owned by the WWE.  Yes it is a tad bit narcissistic, but a lot of our favorite superstars received worldwide stardom after Vince McMahon branded them a WWE superstar.

Same thing with the Attitude Era, to an extent. A good majority of the wrestlers that were big during that time are broken, no longer wrestling or interested in wrestling, or have moved on to a career in their lives that bring more satisfaction and allow them to spend quality time with their young families.

Also, a number of the storylines that worked during that time would be considered politically correct in today's society (remember the militant Black faction, the redneck Biker faction, the fiery Latino faction, the rampant number of women flashing their genitals and being beat up by men ).

All of these things would be counter-productive in today's pro wrestling scene. The most profitable demographic, in my opinion, is not the 18-34 male demographic that tunes in every week to watch the programs on TV. That demographic, as large as we may be, are doing only that...watching the TV programs.

However, it's the mothers that are purchasing the merchandise for their kids, as well as buying the products advertised during the TV shows.

As long as they continue to invest in the product, the WWE will continue to cater to them. By catering to this younger audience, the WWE is also building a strong core of die hard fans that will one day clamor for their own version of the Attitude Era and gladly pay hard cash to see it. The WWE is also building their young stars of today to be the leaders of that era when it arrives.

Until then, all we can do is strap ourselves in and enjoy the ride...

This is Part 1 in a short series of articles that would have been extremely too long for you to read in one sitting. Part 2 will be up shortly.

Saints Panic? Here’s Why the Sky’s Not Falling in New Orleans…Yet

December 29th, 2009 by Paul Augustin, Jr. No comments »

A 17-0 lead.

At home.

Against a 2-12 team they had beaten by a 38-7 score just a month earlier.

Drew Brees vs. rookie Josh Freeman.

And then....

Yuck.

Pierre Thomas leaves the game with bruised ribs.

Marques Colston fumbles.

Michael Spurlock silences the Superdome crowd.

Garrett Hartley chokes.

Utter frustration if you are a Saints fan.

Same old Saints.

The teacher in me, though, says that a lesson can be learned from this loss, and it can be learned before it's too late.

This past fall I was an assistant coach for my school's fifth/sixth grade football team.

On one particular Saturday morning during pregame warmups, my players looked across the field at the other team. A number of players commented on how short the other team looked, and one of them said that they looked like a bunch of ants.

An hour later, those "ants" had bitten my team to the tune of 26-0.

Currently, I am coaching some of those same players on the school's fifth grade basketball team.

It's the opening game of the season, and the same situation unfolds.

One of my players commented that the other team looked really small. I glared at him and reminded him of the last time we underestimated the other team.

Lesson learned, thankfully, as this time we defeated the opponent, 17-6.

After bolting to a 17-0 lead midway through the second quarter, it seemed as if the Saints were content on coasting the rest of the way against a bunch of "ants."

They figured that a two-win team with nothing to play for would have no chance.

There was absolutely no way that Sean Payton, Gregg Williams, and Drew Brees would lose a game to Raheem Morris, Greg Olson, and Josh Freeman.

Except, again, the "ants" won again and the "Aints" of old reared their ugly head.

Now, the Saints travel to Carolina to end the regular season.

Panthers star receiver Steve Smith is lost for this game with a broken arm. It appears as if the Panthers now have little to no passing threat and the Saints can focus on stopping the run.

Don't take the Panthers, their diminished passing game, and 7-8 record lightly.

They still have Jonathan Stewart, who rushed for over 200 yards at Giants Stadium. They also have quarterback Matt Moore, who is looking like the quarterback of the future in Carolina.

Hopefully, the New Orleans Saints learn the same lesson as my fifth graders did.

With a guaranteed week off after the Carolina game, perhaps there's a silver lining in Sunday's loss.

Had the Saints not blown a 17-0 lead or had Hartley's field goal attempt sailed through the uprights, Payton and his staff would have likely treated the season finale like the fourth preseason game.

We'd see Brees, his offensive line, and most of his weapons for maybe a quarter, and then we'd see gray-haired Mark Brunell taking snaps from Nick Leckey, handing the ball off to Lynell Hamilton, and throwing it to Courtney Roby and Darnell Dinkins.

How would the Saints' starters mentally prepare for such a situation?

Coach Payton told a story on NFL radio earlier this season about Brees and work ethic.

Early Sunday afternoon during the Saints' bye week, Payton, who thought he was alone at the Saints practice facility, was leaving work when he saw someone on the Saints field. It was Brees, and he was simulating a game. He was mentally going through every game situation and every play that they had worked on throughout the season.

So we know that Brees would be mentally sharp, but I'm not so sure about the other 52 players on the roster.

If Week 17 meant nothing, then the Saints would likely have gone two (maybe three) weeks without preparing mentally like you need to in the NFL.

Now every Saint is forced to prepare for Week 17 just like it's any other week.

Perhaps losing to the Bucs was a blessing in disguise.


If you haven't voted for the Saints' all-decade team, click here to voice your opinion.

Which AFC Team Could Do the Most Damage As a Wild Card Team?

December 29th, 2009 by Nick Signorelli No comments »

Since the conclusion of Sunday's Week 16 games, we have all been beaten to death with the playoff scenarios. The rumors, speculation, and innuendo is enough to choke a horse. If you want to know what the NFL says about it, check it out here .

But the question lies, which of the possible teams to make the playoffs can do the most damage if they get in? Here are the five possibilities, ranked from worst to first.

 

5 - Denver Broncos

The Denver Broncos started the season off on fire, winning their first six games. Since then, they have gone 2-6. They are great when playing ahead or are in an even game, but when they have to come from behind (Sunday's game against the Eagles excluded), they tend to fall apart.

Their defense started out amazing, but is the main reason the team has suffered down the stretch. The offense does not have enough playmakers, so they would probably be a first round exit.

 

4 - New York Jets

A late Christmas present by the Indianapolis Colts is the only reason that the Jets are even alive right now. Instead of having a battle against a team in Week 17, Cincinnati will already know if they even have a chance for the third seed before the game even starts.

If they don't then the Bengals will be sitting players like the Colts did.

With a rookie coach and quarterback, this is another one-and-done team, regardless of who they play.

 

3 - Houston Texans

The Texans are playing the best football in franchise history. They have already assured themselves that they will have their best record ever, and they are looking like they could cause some waves in the playoffs.

Andre Johnson is solidifying himself as the second best receiver in the NFL (Larry Fitzgerald already has a lock on number one). The biggest knock on this team is playoff experience, which they have none, and that will matter once the playoffs start.

 

2 - Baltimore Ravens

One of the biggest Jekyll/Hyde teams in the NFL. This team can be amazing one Sunday, and horrible the next. They have a defense that is still solid enough to keep teams out of the end zone, and an offense that can put points on the board.

If the Ravens make it to the playoff, they will be able to push any of the top four seeds to the brink, and even cause some upsets. Baltimore could end up playing in the AFC Championship again, like they did as a Wild Card team last year.

 

1 - Pittsburgh Steelers

Call me a homer if you like, but the Steelers have what it takes to make a run at the Super Bowl. Some people will point to the fact that the Steelers have lost to the Browns, Raiders, and Chiefs. While that may be so, they have also defeated the Vikings, Chargers, Packers, and Ravens.

When the Steelers are at full strength (Troy Polamalu in the line up), which they will if they make it to the playoffs, they can beat anyone.

Add to that the playoff experience this team has, if the Steelers make it to the playoffs, teams should be scared. This team could make a Super Bowl run from the six seed. They have done it before.

Memphis Grizzlies Can Make the 2010 NBA Playoffs

December 29th, 2009 by A. Enslen Butler No comments »

Playoffs?

The Grizzlies? The Memphis Grizzlies?

Don't laugh. As of Monday, Memphis is four-and-one-half games from the No. 8 spot in the Western Conference.
Yes, they are still last in the Southwest Division. But they are only a half-game behind New Orleans and four games behind third-place Houston (and we have no idea what is going to happen with the Tracy McGrady situation).
As we close 2009, I want to give the Grizzlies a four-point plan to make the 2010 NBA Playoffs.

Point One: Decide on the point guard once and for all.
Mike Conley can run hot and cold. Jamaal Tinsley and Marcus Williams are good passers, but horrible shooters. On potential, Conley is probably the best of the three.
But the eye-test tells me that none have made the case to be the every-game starter.
The best solution might be to start O.J. Mayo at point. Although I am not a big fan of that, it might be the best solution.

 

Point Two: Do not trade Rudy Gay right now.

Since Gay will become a restricted free agent in 2010, they might be tempted to trade him now to get value for him. Don't. Wait until the off season and scan the market. You are going to have the money under the cap to sign him if you want.

Let's see the number before you give him away in a Pau-Gasol-type deal.

 

Point Three: Keep giving Zach Randolph the ball.

No one is playing better than Zach Randolph. He is playing at an All-Star level while becoming the number one scoring option on the team. As long as they remain the same, the Grizzlies will be fine offensively.

 

Point Four:  Keep developing Hasheem Thabeet.

Remember him? It is an interesting season where the top pick in the 2009 Draft has not played and the No. 2 is buried on the bench. However, Thabeet has shown to be a defensive force at times. If he can provide some defense and ANY scoring, it could set the Grizzlies apart at the end.

With the four-point plan and a little luck, Memphis can put themselves into position for the No. 8 seed. Tell me what you think. Can Memphis make the playoffs? Or, should fans be happy with a .500 team for now. Let me now in the comments.

Note: You can follow my podcast at Memphis Grizzlies Report .

 

NFL Late Hits: Week 16

December 29th, 2009 by Andrew Garda No comments »

I'm going to try and not make this whole column be about the Colts and Head Coach Jim Caldwell.

It may be hard.

I'll give this to the Colts' coach—damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.

Well, I guess if you were predisposed to think Peyton Manning—one of the most durable quarterbacks in the game—would end up hurt. Frankly, I wouldn't think that way.

I can't put it better than my boy Sigmund Bloom did on Twitter :

You can't coach afraid of negative outcomes, you focus on the positive outcomes you are pushing towards. Wonder how team feels right now.

Caldwell was preserving Manning, a guy who rarely gets hurt, and may have thrown off the timing of a team who was on a roll. There's no way he puts the starters in for long this week, is there?

We're watching momentum disintegrate for the Saints—are we going to see it for the Colts now?

As for the Jets, Mark Sanchez didn't throw an interception.  Starters may have been sitting, but Sanchez protected the ball. Big deal for him this season considering how he has struggled. Good decisions, solid play-calling, effective ground game.

They still need to win against the Bengals (starters or not) and all those things need to be going if they are going to win.

Interesting side note: The Colts/Jets game inspired this piece of writing on a University of North Carolina website called The 5th Corner where writer AEM uses it as a cautionary tale for the NCAA Basketball Tournament , which is considering a move to a 96 team tournament.

(sidenote-within-a-sidenote: I think expanding to that size is a horrible idea, incredibly unmanageable and frankly giving the College BCS anti-playoff people ammunition they don't need .) 

See what you did Jim Caldwell?

The Chargers, Cowboys and Patriots seem to be heating up at the right time.  The is standard operating procedure for the Bolts it seems but new ground for Dallas.

Romo has turned the concept he's a Christmas choke artist on its ear the last few weeks. Maybe the Cowboys aren't perfect and maybe they won't make it far into the playoffs, but they seem to be ready for the playoffs at a time when some teams—like the aforementioned Colts and Saints as well as the Vikings—are stumbling.

In the last few years, both the Giants and Cardinals have shown us where momentum can take you. One of the fringe teams will heat up and cause some havoc in the playoffs.

Finally, I've danced around it enough this month: it's retarded that Titans running back Chris Johnson isn't getting more buzz for MVP. Beyond that, it's criminal. I'm not saying he should be a lock to win it, but not enough writers are even taking note of him beyond 'wow he's pretty good'.

Maybe it's a moot point, given that his team has struggled even when he's doing well and his impact on any game is negligible.

This fallacy—or what I consider one—pretty much makes it impossible for almost any position not named 'Quarterback', a problem which is already part of the Heisman lack of defensive players.

No one player wins a game every time out (just ask John Elway) but the MVP needs to be a game changer. Chris Johnson is a constant threat to break a long touchdown—a defense cannot afford to ignore him or he will burn them.

Maybe he hasn't won a lot of games for the Titans. But at any moment, he could.

That should count for something in my opinion.






eXTReMe Tracker